The House of Rothschild

Ancient Writings, ancient wisdom, Ancient Egypt Etc

Moderator: BASEL

Post Reply
User avatar
MasterSamWise
AKA The Thinker
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 5:52 am
Location: everywhere

The House of Rothschild

Post by MasterSamWise » Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:59 pm

The House of Rothschild


from "Descent into Slavery" by Des Grifin Ch 6


"Crown" refers to the owners of the Bank of England. Their identities are
an offical secret. According to E.C. Knuth, the "international financial
oligarchy uses the allegoric 'Crown' as its symbol of power and has its
headquarter in the ancient city of London...the giant Bank of England, a
privately owned institution... is not subject to regulation by the British
parliament and is in effect a sovereign world power." (The Empire of the City, p. 59)

The powerful conspirators are made up largely of the international
bankers, and the Illuminati, which is a super-rich organization, which
controls the mainstream media, workforce, education system, companies,
banks, energy supplies and governments. They are controlled by the richest people in the world such as the super-rich Rothschild and Rockefeller families. They also hide behind many organizations such as the United Nations, the WTO and the Council on Foreign relations.

There seems to be little doubt that the Rothschilds continue to influence
the world economy, and it is known that they are squarely behind the
movement to unite all the western European nations into a single political
entity which is just another step towards one-world government.

THE CITY

When people think of England such terms as 'Great Britain,' 'The
When people hear of 'The Crown' they automatically think of the King or
Queen; when they hear of 'London' or the 'The City' they instantly think
of the capital of England in which the monarch has his or her official
residence.

To fully understand the unique and generally unknown subject we must
define our terms: When we speak of 'The City' we are in fact referring to a privately owned Corporation - or Sovereign State - occupying an
irregular rectangle of 677 acres and located right in the heart of the 610
square mile 'Greater London' area. The population of 'The City' is listed
at just over four thousand, whereas the population of 'Greater London' (32 boroughs) is approximately seven and a half million.

The 'Crown' is a committee of twelve to fourteen men who rule the
independent sovereign state known as London or 'The City.' 'The City' is
not part of England. It is not subject to the Sovereign. It is not under
the rule of the British parliament. Like the Vatican in Rome, it is a
separate, independent state. It is the Vatican of the commercial world.
The City, which is often called "the wealthiest square mile on earth," is
ruled over by a Lord Mayor. Here are grouped together Britian's great
financial and commercial institutions: Wealthy banks, dominated by the
privately-owned (Rothschild controlled) Bank of England, Lloyd's of
London, the London Stock Exchange, and the offices of most of the leading
international trading concerns. [Such as the British Invisibles, I kid you
not]. Here, also, is located Fleet Street, the heart and core of the
newspaper and publishing worlds.

TWO MONARCHS

The Lord Mayor, who is elected for a one year stint, is the monarch in the
City. As Aubrey Menen says in "London", Time-Life, 1976, p. 16: "The
relation of this monarch of the City to the monarch of the realm [Queen]
is curious and tells much." It certainly is and certainly does !

When the Queen of England goes to visit the City she is met by the Lord
Mayor at Temple Bar, the symbolic gate of the City. She bows and asks for permission to enter his private, sovereign State. During such State visits

"the Lord Mayor in his robes and chain, and his entourage in medieval
costume, outshines the royal party, which can dress up no furhter than
service uniforms." The Lord Mayor leads the queen into his city.

The reason should be clear. The Lord Mayor is the monarch. The Queen is
his subject ! The monarch always leads the way. The subject always stays a pace or two behind !

The small clique who rule the City dictate to the British Parliament. It
tells them what to do, and when. In theory Britian is ruled by a Prime
Minister and a Cabinet of close advisers. These 'fronts' go to great
lengths to create the impression that they are running the show but, in
reality, they are mere puppets whose strings are pulled by the shadowy
characters who dominate behind the scenes. As the former British Prime
Minister of England during the late 1800s Benjamin D'israeli wrote: "So
you see... the world is governed by very different personages from what isimagined by those who are not behind the scenes" (Coningsby, The Century Co., N.Y., 1907, p. 233).

This fact is further demonstrated by another passage from Menen's book:
"The Prime Minister, a busy politician, is not expected to understand the
mysteries of high finance, while the Chancellor of the Exchequer [Budget
Director] is only expected to understand them when he introduces the
budget. Both are advised by the permanent officials of the Treasury, and
these listen to the City.

If they suspect that some policy of the government will [back-fire]... it is no use their calling up British ambassadors to ask if it is so; they can find out more quickly from the City. As one ambassador complained to me, diplomats are nowadays no more than office boys, and slow ones at that.

"The City will know. They will tell the Treasury and the Treasury will
tell the Prime Minister. Woe betide him if he does not listen. The most
striking instance of this happened in recent history. In 1956 the then
Prime Minister, Sir Anthony Eden... launched a war to regain the Suez
Canal. It had scarcely begun when the City let it be known that in a few
days he would have no more money to fight it; the Pound would collapse. He stopped the war and was turned out of office by his party. When the Prime Minister rises to address the Lord Mayor's banquet, he hopes that the City will put more behind him than the gold plate lavishly displayed on the sideboard" (p. 18).

History clearly reveals that the British government is the bond slave of
the "invisible and inaudible" force centered in the City. The City calls
the tune. The "visible and audible leaders" are mere puppets who dance to
that tune on command. They have no power. They have no authority. In spite of all the outward show they are mere pawns in the game being played by the financial elite.


HISTORY of the 'CITY'

From William the Conqueror until the middle of the seventeenth
century the British Monarchs ruled supreme - their word was law. They
truly were Sovereign in every sense of the word. As British strength and
influence grew around the world toward the end of the 1600s the wealth,
strength and influence of the elite merchants in the City also grew - only
at a faster pace. In 1694 the privately owned Bank of England (a central
bank) was established to finance the profligate ways of William III. The
bank was financed by a group of City merchants who used William Paterson as a 'front.' The names of the founders have never been made public.

It was at that juncture that the Bank of England and the City began to
dominate and control the affairs of Britain. Their influence and wealth
grew in leaps and bounds in the century that followed. "The Illustrated
Universal History," 1878, records that "Great Britain emerged from her
long contest with France with increased power and national glory. Her
Empire was greatly expanded in all parts of the world; her supremacy on
the sea was undisputed; her wealth and commerce were increased... But withall this national prosperity, the lower classes of the English people were sunk in extreme wretchedness and poverty, having been bled dry during the struggle of the previous twenty years.

It was at this juncture (1815) that the House of Rothschild seized control
of the British economy, the Bank of England and the City - and, through
their other branches, control of the other European nations.

Prior to this period Britain had developed colonies and outposts in the
far-flung reaches of the globe. During its heyday in the nineteenth
century approximately 90% of all international trade was carried in
British ships. Other shippers had to pay the Crown royalties or
commissions for the 'privilege' of doing business on the high seas. During
these years 'Britannia Ruled the Waves' through the domination of the most modern and powerful navy known up to that time.


TWO SEPARATE EMPIRES

To avoid misunderstanding, it is important that the reader recognize the
fact that two separate empires were operating under the guise of the
British Empire. One was the Crown Empire and the other was the British
Empire.

All the colonial possessions that were white were under the Sovereign -ie. under the authority of the British government. Such nations as the Union of South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Canada were governed under British law. These only represented thirteen percent of the people who made up the inhabitants of the British Empire.

All the other parts of the British Empire - nations like India, Eqypt,
Bermuda, Malta, Cyprus and colonies in Central Africa, Sinapore, Hong Kong and Gilbraltar (those areas inhabited by the browns, yellows and blacks) were all Crown Colonies. These were not under British rule. The British parliament had no authority over them. They were privately owned and ruled by a private club in London, England known as the Crown.

The Crown's representative in such areas held the absolute power of life and death over all the people under his juristiction. There were no courts and no method of appeal or retribution against a decision rendered by the
representatives of the Crown. Even a British citizen who committed a crime in a Crown colony was subject to the Crown law. He couldn't appeal to British law as it didn't apply.

As the Crown owned the committee known as the British government there was no problem getting the British taxpayer to pay for naval and military forces to maintain the Crown's supremacy in these areas. Any revolts were met with terrible retribution by the British navy at no cost to the Crown.

The City reaped fantastic profits from its operations conducted under the
protection of the British armed forces. This wasn't British commerce and
British wealth. The international bankers, prosperous merchants and the
British aristocracy who were part of the 'City' machine accumulated vast
fortunes which they lavishly squandered in their pursuit of prestige and
standing in British Society. Had the wealth been spread out among all the
people in the British Isles prosperity would have abounded.


In spite of the wealth of the world flowing into the City the majority of
the British people were barely making ends meet. Many were impoverished to the point of despair. The elite lived in regal splendor. The poor British peasants were never given a chance to get a cut of the action.

Simon Haxey in "England's Money Lords," drew his readers'
attention to the "total disregard or open contempt displayed by the
aristocracy" towards the British people. He also asked, "What part do the
colonial people play in the battle for democracy when they themselves have no democratic rights and the British governing class refuses to grant such rights" (pp. 114,115)


David Lloyd George, a future prime minister, emphasized the power of the
City and its total contempt for the "wretches" who were not part of the
'club.' In a 1910 speech he stated: "We do most of the business of the
world. We carry more international trade - probably ten times more - than
Germany. Germany carries her own trade largely. The international trade is
ours. Well, we do not do it for nothing. As a matter of fact, our shipping
brings us over a hundred millions (pounds) a year, mostly paid by that
wretched foreigner. I'm taxing the foreigner for all I know... You've
heard a good deal of talk here, probably, about the exportation of capital
abroad. There is no way in which we can make the foreigner pay more... We
get the foreigner in four ways by that. The first way we leave to Lord
Rothschild..." ("Better Times", published 1910).

About seventy years ago Vincent Cartwright Vickers stated that
"...financiers in reality took upon themselves, perhaps not the
responsibility, but certainly the power of controlling the markets of the
world and therefore the numerous relationships between one nation and
another, involving international friendship and mistrusts... Loans to
foreign countries are organized and arranged by the City of London with no
thought whatsoever of the nation's welfare but soley in order to increase
indebtedness upon which the City thrives and grows rich... This national
and mainly international dictatorship of money which plays off one country
against another and which, through ownership of a large portion of the
press, converts the advertisement of its own private opinion into a
semblance of general public opinion, cannot for much longer be permitted
to render Democratic Government a mere nickname. Today, we see through a
glass darkly; for there is so much which 'it would not be in the public
interest to divulge'..." (E.C. Knuth, "Empire of 'The City'", p. 65).

All of the above points were stressed by Roland G. Usher on pages 80, 83
and 84 of "Pan Germanism," written in 1913: "The London and Paris bankers
[the international bankers] control the available resources of the world
at any one moment, and can therefore practically permit or prevent the
undertaking of any enterprise requiring the use of more than a hundred
million dollars actual value..."

The international bankers "own probably the major part of the bonded
indebtedness of the world. Russia, Turkey, Egypt, India, China, Japan, and
South America are probably owned, so far as any nation can be owned, in
London or Paris. Payment of interest on these vast sums is secured by the
pledging of the public revenues of these countries, and, in the case of
the weaker nations, by the actual delivery of the perception into the
hands of the agents of the English and French bankers. In addition, a very
large share, if not the major part, of the stocks and industrial
securities of the world are owned by those two nations and the policies of
many of the world's enterprises dictated by their financial heads. The
world itself, in fact, pays them tribute; it actually rises in the morning
to earn its living by utilizing their capital, and occupies its days in
making them still wealthier."

In 1946 E.C. Knuth wrote: "The bulwark of the British financial oligarchy
lies in its ageless and self-perpetuating nature, its long-range planning
and prescience, its facility to outwait and break the patience of its
opponents. The transient and temporal statesmen of Europe and particularly
of Britain itself, who have attempted to curb this monstrosity, have all
been defeated by their limited tenure of confidence. Obligated to show
action and results in a too short span of years, they have been outwitted
and outwaited, deluged with irritants and difficulties; eventually obliged
to temporize and retreat. There are few who have opposed them in Britain
and America, without coming to a disgraceful end, but many, who served
them well, have also profited well". ("Empire of 'The City,'" p. 65).

How did they do it? That's the recurring question in Niall Ferguson's
formidable The House of Rothschild, a history of the legendary
European-Jewish banking family. ''There is but one power in Europe and
that is Rothschild,'' said a French journalist in 1841, giving voice to
the popular suspicion that the dynasty and its money held sway over the
affairs of nations.

The globalists are centred on the Rothschild-dominated Bank of England,
MI-6 and the secretive Round Table society, which spawned the Royal
Institute of International Affairs. The American branches include the
Council on Foreign Relations, CIA and the Rockefeller foundations which
all ensure the American people continue to finance and enforce one-world
tyranny. The Bush family has owed its prominence to this cabal ever since
grandfather Prescott Bush helped arrange financing for Nazism.

They also will use the attacks to gain control of the few nations in the
world who don't allow Rothschild central banks and so less than one month
after these attacks, US forces attack Afghanistan, one of only 7 nations
in the world who don't have a Rothschild controlled central bank.

Ancient Babylon, I mean Iraq, is now one of six nations left in the world
who don't have a Rothschild controlled central bank.

There are now only 5 nations on the world left without a Rothschild
controlled central bank: Iran; North Korea; Sudan; Cuba; and Libya.

1998: The European Central Bank is set up in Frankfurt, the city from
which the Rothschilds originate.

2001: On September 11th the attack on the World Trade Center is
orchestrated by Britain, America and Israel under the orders of the
Rothschilds as a pretext for removing the liberty of people worldwide in
exchange for security, just as they did with the Reichstag fire in Germany
where the citizens were lied to in order to give up liberty for security.

They also will use the attacks to gain control of the few nations in the
world who don�t allow Rothschild central banks and so less than one month
after these attacks, US forces attack Afghanistan, one of only 7 nations
in the world who don�t have a Rothschild controlled central bank.

The Labour Party leader and likely next Prime Minister of the UK is Tony
Blair, a Bilderberger and Elite "chosen one". Blair attended the 1993
Bilderberg meeting in Greece with his "opponent" Kenneth Clarke. During
his 1996 visit to the United States, Blair met a series of Elite frontmen,
including Bill Clinton, Henry Kissinger, Alan Greenspan, head of the
Federal Reserve and George Soros, the global financial manipulator who
operates under orders from the House of Rothschild. All of them are
Bilderbergers.

Behind the creation of the European Union is the Bilderberg Group, the
deeply secretive cartel of leading bankers, heads of transnational
corporations, politicians, academics and "opinion formers", media bosses
and military chiefs. The Bilderberg Group is part of a network including
the Royal Institute of International Affairs (UK), the Council on Foreign
Relations (USA) and the Trilateral Commission (USA, Europe, Japan). All
work to the same agenda.

The European Union we see today has been designed from the very beginning
by those who control the Bilderberg Group - the House of Rothschild, the
Rockefellers, and the "blue blood" families (tribes) of Europe.

The transformation of Europe into a massive centralised dictatorship is
only a strand of the global web of deceit I detail in 'And The Truth Shall
Set You Free' , but it is a key part of the New World Order agenda for
centralised control of the planet. The Elite who dominate the global
financial and political systems are seeking to impose a world government,
central bank and currency which would oversee and dictate the policies of
three groupings of superstates.

A small number of extremely wealthy people, descendants of wealthy
families in Europe and the U.S, own a major part of the material wealth of
the world. This power is concentrated in London which is the centre of the
world banking system. The control they exercise is kept within the
original families and passed down from generation to generation. They are
highly organised, operating in secret through a web of 'private'
organisations.

This group is known as the Global Elite.
Their wealth is accumulating on a compound basis. They determine the
course of history, through virtual control of the world economy.

The Bretton Woods conference also structured Anglo-American hegemony over world oil supplies and led to the creation of the all-powerful International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB) which, under the control of the US Federal Reserve System, since then, deliberately andruthlessly, have put most of the so-called Third World into extreme debt.

It has been said that the WB and IMF "have arguably done more harm to more people than any other non-military institutions in history." As Jesse
Jackson put it in 1993: "They no longer use bullets and ropes. They use
the World Bank and the IMF." Between 1982 and 1990, debtor countries paid back more than $1,300 billion but began the nineties 61 percent more indebt than they were in 1992. Sub-Saharan African debt alone increased by 113 percent." In 1993, for every one pound given in aid, rich nations took back 3 pounds in debt payments. Nigerian writer and environmentalist, Ken saro-Wiwa, roundly condemned the World Bank's position:

The IMF was never designed to help the Third World or end poverty. It was established by the Bretton Woods conference of 1944 to restore economic and financial order to the Western world. There was no element of compassion for humanity in its formulation. The Fund's aim is first and
foremost to assure the interests of developed countries. We make or breakhuman life every day of every year as probably no other force has ever done in the past or will ever do again.

Coupled with these two exceptionally powerful organisations are the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), formulated shortly after
the WB and IMF, and finally signed in 1993, and the new World Trade
Organisation (WTO) of 1995. This quadruplet is now able to enforce
throughout the world the doctrine of corporate libertarianism - a
transnational corporate bill of rights - and God help any country that
gets in the way.

That the Rothschilds are Jewish and that their commitment has always beenfully towards Judaism is of no doubt. Reports of Mayer Amschel Rothschildconsulting and debating the Talmud on a regular basis with Orthodox Rabbis are recorded in Rothschild history, and subsequently, the Rothschilds became the primary moving force behind world Zionism (see the "Balfour Declaration").

Furthermore, in addition to all of the above, the pattern
of historical Zionist successes in the 20th century clearly proves that
the Rothschilds and their conspirators and collaborators are in control of
the plan of the Illuminati for one-world government under the New World
Order, and are the prevailing influence in the world since the beginning
of the 19th century. And what better government to control could there be
in the world for intrepid international financiers such as the Rothschilds
and their conspirators and collaborators



Check out this AP story, archived on an Arnold Schwartzenegger fan
website, which documents Arnold's and Buffet's 2002 meeting in the
Rothschild ancestral home.

Baron M.A. Rothschild wrote, "Give me control over a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws." All that is needed to effectively control
a government is to have control over the nation's money: a central bank
with a monopoly over the supply of money and credit. This had been done in Western Europe, with the creation of privately owned central banks such as the Bank of England.

How are all of the following individuals and organizations connected?
Freemasonry, The Federal Reserve, The Rothschild's, The Rockefeller's, The Carnegies, The Council On Foreign Relations, The United Nations, the
Bilderbergers, The Club of Rome, The Trilateral Commission, Lucis Trust,
The World Constitution and Parliament Association, Ted Turner, the
Jesuits, and the Illuminati. All of your questions about GLOBALIZATION,
which began with these organizations and individuals will be answered in
this detailed, informative expose.

LUCIFERS NETWORK Masters Of The New World Order connects individuals,banks, oil cartels, foundations, organizations, corporations, and the main ringleaders who have NETWORKED the world into a MASTER PLAN for a NEW WORLD ORDER OF GLOBAL GOVERNMENT. Unlike other books about GLOBAL CONSPIRACIES, Sunstar�s work is detailed, thorough, and will answer questions you have been asking about concerning CONSPIRACY THEORIES surrounding GLOBALIZATION.

Accounting for the Rothschild Wealth and Influence

Morton (1962) noted that the Rothschild wealth was estimated at over $6
billion US in 1850. Not a significant amount in today's dollars; however,
consider the potential future value compounded over 147 years!

Taking $6 billion (and assuming no erosion of the wealth base) and
compounding that figure at various returns on investment (a conservative
range of 4% to 8%) would suggest the following net worth of the Rothschild family enterprise:

$1.9 trillion US (@ 4%)
$7.8 trillion US (@ 5%)
$31.5 trillion US (@ 6%)
$125,189.1 trillion US (@ 7%)
$491,409.0 trillion US (@ 8%)



MasterSamWise bron
We create our own reality

User avatar
Rossco
Roving Reporter
Posts: 452
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:21 pm
Location: Newtownards

Post by Rossco » Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:40 am

evil people them Rothchilds...EVIL :shock:
Well you may throw your rock and hide your hand
Workin' in the dark against your fellow man
But as sure as God made black and white
What's down in the dark will be brought to the light

Post Reply